Draft a decision log entry recording the choice of [tool] over [alternative], the reasons given, and who approved the decision.
Summarise the attached evaluation of [tool] against the firm's criteria for data handling, provider conflict, and cost, and give a recommendation.
Based on the attached vendor information, check whether [vendor] or its parent company is a current litigation opponent of the firm or a company the firm has declined to represent.
Draft a short internal announcement about [change, e.g. a new approved tool or policy update], stating what is changing, from when, and who to contact with questions.
Draft five frequently asked questions and answers on the AI Use Policy, covering data classification, approved tools, and what to do if a client asks about AI use on their matter.
Summarise the attached internal AI audit findings into a short list of gaps and a suggested owner for each.
Draft an entry for the AI systems register for [tool name], covering provider, intended use, data classification allowed, and approval status, based on the attached vendor information.
From the attached case list, extract all upcoming notification or filing deadlines in the next 60 days, sorted by date.
From the attached facts, calculate the applicable deadline for [obligation, e.g. Article 50 AI Act transparency obligation] for [client], and list the steps needed before that date.
Given the classification of this document and the list of approved tools, confirm whether it can be processed by [tool] under the current AI Use Policy.
Read the attached document and suggest a data classification from C1 to C5 based on the AI Use Policy definitions, with a one sentence justification.
